Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Karounos v Sabre International Ltd [2002] FCA 736
SETTLEMENT – whether a settlement agreement existed as a matter of fact. AGENCY – actual or ostensible authority of a solicitor to enter into a settlement agreement. GEORGE KAROUNOS & ANOR v SABRE INTERNATIONAL LTD & ORS S 18 OF 2002 O'LOUGHLIN J 13 JUNE 2002 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 18 OF 2002
BETWEEN: GEORGE KAROUNOS as trustee of the RFC TRUST
FIRST APPLICANT
REAL CORPORATION AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 089 326 367)
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: SABRE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
STEPHEN GLEN HEINRICH
SECOND RESPONDENT
JOHN LYALL NEWBOLD
THIRD RESPONDENT
NANCY JEAN NEWBOLD
FOURTH RESPONDENT
BRADLEY EDMOND HICKS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
JENNIFER MARY HEINRICH
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: O'LOUGHLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JUNE 2002
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application that was filed by the applicants on 22 January 2002 be dismissed. 2. Costs in the cause, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 18 OF 2002
BETWEEN: GEORGE KAROUNOS as trustee of the RFC TRUST
FIRST APPLICANT
REAL CORPORATION AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 089 326 367)
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: SABRE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate