Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zhaou v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 748
MIGRATION – application for review of a decision of a delegate of the respondent to cancel the applicant's tourist visa pursuant to s 116(1)(g) of the Migration Act and reg 2.43(1)(k) of the Migration Regulations – inquiry about grounds to cancel the applicant's visa – privative clause decision – whether necessary to consider effect of privative clause – whether, in breach of ss 119(1) and 121(3), the interview between the applicant and the delegate did not take place at the time specified – whether in breach of ss 119(1) and 121(3), the time within which the applicant was to respond at an interview was a reasonable period – requirements of ss 119(1)(b) and 121(3)(b). WORDS & PHRASES – "reasonable period"
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 116, s 119, s 121, s 474 Migration Regulations 1994, reg 2.43(1)(k)
R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited R v Coldham; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union (1983) 153 CLR 415 referred O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232 referred Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 referred Darling Casino Ltd v NSW Casino Control Authority (1997) 191 CLR 602 referred R v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387 referred The Queen v The Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Amalgamated Engineering Union (Australian Section) (1967) 118 CLR 219 referred The Queen v Coldham; Ex parte The Australian Workers' Union (1982) 153 CLR 415 referred Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 referred NAAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 referred NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 281 referred Park v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 346 referred NABM of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 335 referred VBAH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 388 referred Turcan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 397 discussed NADD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 448 referred Jia Jing Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 477 referred Jian Zhong Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 167 referred Boakye-Danquah v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 438 referred Kwan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 498 referred SBBK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 565 referred Awan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 594 referred Zhang Jia Qing v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Burchett J, unreported decision, delivered 5 November 1997) discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Zhang (1999) 53 ALD 261 referred Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred Budiyal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 82 FCR 166 referred Tien v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 159 ALR 405 cited ALEX ZHAOU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 226 of 2002 KENNY J 12 JUNE 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate