Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McAuliffe v Comcare [2002] FCA 769
Workers' compensation – Commonwealth employees compensation – compensation for permanent impairment – whether impairment of shoulder and incapacity for work "resulted from" injury sustained during course of military service – application of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) to injury occurring prior to the commencement of that Act – Tribunal determined that the respondent was not liable for ongoing workers' compensation although determined that the respondent was liable for loss of 10 percent of efficient use of the applicant's shoulder – whether Tribunal's reasons for the decision are inadequate – whether there was "no evidence" to enable the Tribunal to find that a subsequent event injuring the applicant's shoulder was a "new incident" – whether the Tribunal took into account irrelevant considerations in so far as it found that his psychological and alcohol problems were a significant cause of his impaired incapacity for work.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43(2), 43(2A), 43(2B), 44 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 14, 16, 19, 24, 27, 29, 124
Brennan v Comcare (1994) 122 ALR 615 applied Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates (1994) 35 NSWLR 452 followed Isley v Wattyl Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 1 cited State of Tasmania v Robertson (2001) 10 Tas R 60 cited Telescourt v Commonwealth (1991) 29 FCR 227 cited Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 cited Rich Rivers Radio Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1989) 22 FCR 437 cited Collins v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 36 ALR 598 applied BRUCE FRANCIS McAULIFFE v COMCARE Q 80 OF 2001
DRUMMOND J 17 JUNE 2002 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 80 OF 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate