Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brivis Australia Pty Ltd v Seeley International Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 843
PATENTS – petty patent – evaporative air conditioner – prior art said to render the applicant's patent invalid – notice of motion by the applicant seeking a See v Scott-Paine order granting leave to the applicant to discontinue the substantive proceedings with protection from an adverse costs order PROCEDURE – discretion of the Court when a party seeks leave to discontinue under Order 22 of the Federal Court Rules Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 40 See v Scott - Paine (1933) 50 RPC 56 considered GEC Alsthom Limited's Patent [1996] FSR 415 followed SCI Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1984) 2 FCR 118 applied
BRIVIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 783 493) v SEELEY INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (ACN 054 687 035) and SEELEY INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (ACN 054 687 035) and BRIVIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 783 493) S 9 of 2000 O'LOUGHLIN J 3 JULY 2002 ADELAIDE (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 9 OF 2000
BETWEEN: BRIVIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 783 493)
APPLICANT
AND: SEELEY INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (ACN 054 687 035)
RESPONDENT
SEELEY INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (ACN 054 687 035)
CROSS-CLAIMANT
BRIVIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 783 493)
CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: O'LOUGHLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2002
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Further consideration of these proceedings is adjourned to a date subsequent to the expiration of a period of six weeks from the date hereof. 2. Liberty to the parties to apply, thereafter, to have the matter brought on for further consideration upon seven days notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate