Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Elias v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 845 TAXATION – controlling interest superannuation arrangement – applicant applied to Commissioner for a deferment of time for payment of tax under s 255-10 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – Commissioner refused application having regard to the "ATO Receivables Policy" – whether the Receivables Policy was an impermissible fetter on the Commissioner's statutory discretion – whether the Commissioner took into account an irrelevant consideration – whether the Commissioner failed to take into account relevant circumstances WORDS & PHRASES – "take into account"
Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Part 4.15, s 8AAD, 8AAG, 8AAG(3), 8AAG(4), 8AAG(5), 14ZZM, 14ZZR, 250-10, 250-25, 255-1, 255-5, 255-10, 255-10(1) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)s 13 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 204, 204(1), 204(3), 204(3)(a), 206 General Interest Charge (Imposition) Bill 1998 (Cth)
Harris v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1689 considered Re Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (No 2) (1979) 2 ALD 634 cited Chumbairux v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1986) 74 ALR 480 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1985-1986) 162 CLR 24 applied Ahern v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 50 ALR 177 considered Sean Investments Pty Ltd v MacKellar (1981) 38 ALR 363 applied Harts Fidelity Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 42 ATR 438 followed Thurecht v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 84 ATC 4,480 considered Barina Corporation Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1985) 6 FCR 368 considered ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 197 considered Nestle Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 16 FCR 167 considered Paul v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 64 ALD 289 applied Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v Australian Securities Commission (1996) 136 ALR 453 considered NIB Health Funds Ltd v Private Health Insurance Administration Council [2002] FCA 40 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate