Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Orion Pet Products Pty Ltd v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Vic) [2002] FCA 860
TRADE PRACTICES – representations made by or on behalf of RSPCA regarding applicant's manufactured products, electronic dog collars - whether representations false – whether conduct was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive –whether RSPCA a "trading corporation" – whether representations made "in trade or commerce" INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD – elements of tort – whether requisite mental state established DEFAMATION – whether statements made concerning applicant's products conveyed imputations pleaded – whether statements defamatory – whether applicant identified - defences of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege WORDS AND PHRASES – "trading corporation" - "in trade or commerce" Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53(a) Mummery v Irvings Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 99 at 110 referred to Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 at 664 referred to Bruce v Odhams Press Ltd [1936] 1 KB 697 at 713 referred to Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1996) ATPR 41-522 at 42,679 referred to Mitanis v Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd (1997) ATPR 41-591 at 44,152 referred to Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-633 at 40,978 referred to Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-691 at 42,827 referred to Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1991) 105 ALR 456 referred to James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1986) 64 ALR 347 at 372 referred to Global Sportsman v Mirror Newspapers (1984) 2 FCR 82 at 88 referred to Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (1993) 38 FCR 1 at 25-26, 45-48 referred to Stanton v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1987) ATPR 40-755 referred to Turner v Jenolan Investments Pty Ltd, Jenolan Investments Pty Ltd v Turner, Turner v Acfold Investments Pty Ltd (1985) ATPR 40-571 at 46,635 referred to Sabre Corporation Pty Ltd v Laboratories Pharm-a-Care Pty Ltd (1995) ATPR 41-396 referred to Riley McKay v Bannerman (1977) 31 FLR 129 at 134 referred to Given v CV Holland (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1977) 29 FLR 212 at 217 referred to The Queen v Trade Practices Tribunal: Ex parte St George County Council (1974) 130 CLR 533 at 543, 546, 553, 561-2 and 572 referred to The Queen v Federal Court of Australia; Ex parte W.A. National Football League (1979) 143 CLR 190 at 208, 234 and 239 referred to Hughes v WA Cricket Association Inc (1986) 19 FCR 10 at 29 referred to Forbes v Australian Yachting Federation Inc (1996) 131 FLR 241 at 291 referred to Fasold v Roberts (1997) 70 FCR 489 at 525-526 referred to The Commonwealth v Tasmania (The Tasmanian Dam Case) (1983) 158 CLR 1 at 240 referred to E v Australian Red Cross Society (1991) 27 FCR 310 at 343 considered United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board (1998) 83 FCR 346 considered Quickenden v O'Connor (2001) 109 FCR 243 at 260, 261 referred to Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 at 602-604 applied Nixon v Slater & Gordon (2000) 175 ALR 15 at 23, 23 and 34 referred to Unilan Holdings v Kerin (1992) 35 FCR 272 referred to Tobacco Institute of Australia v Woodward (1993) 32 NSWLR 559 referred to Plimer v Roberts (1997) 80 FCR 303 referred to Robin Pty Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1019 referred to Glorie v WA Chip & Pulp Co Pty Ltd (1981) 55 FLR 310 referred to Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 referred to Ratcliffe v Evans [1982] 2 QB 524 referred to John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 506 at 507 referred to Barnes v Sharpe (1910) 11 CLR 462 referred to Australian Broadcast Corporation v Comalco Ltd (1986) 68 ALR 259 referred to Parmiter v Coupland (1840) 6 M&W 105 at 108 referred to Slatyer v The Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co Ltd (1908) 6 CLR 1 at 7 referred to Gardiner v Fairfax (1942) 42 SR(NSW) 171 at 172 referred to Farquhar v Bottom [1980] 2 NSWLR 380 at 386 referred to Knupffer v London Express [1944] AC 116 at 120 referred to Morgan v Odhams Press [1971] 1 WLR 1239 referred to Mirror Newspapers v World Hosts Pty Ltd (1979) 141 CLR 632 at 639 referred to Mann v Medicine Group (1992) 38 FCR 400 referred to Speight v Gosnay (1891) 60 LJQB 231 referred to Polly Peck (Holdings) Plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000 considered Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519 referred to Robinson v Laws [2001] QCA 122 referred to David Syme & Co Ltd v Hore-Lacey [2000] 1 VR 667 referred to Anderson v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2001) 3 VR 619 referred to Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Parker (1992) 29 NSWLR 448 referred to Clarke v Norton [1910] VLR 494 at 499 referred to London Artists v Littler [1969] 2 QB 375 at 391 referred to Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 at 334 referred to Smith's Newspaper Ltd v Becker (1932) 47 CLR 279 at 304 referred to Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 referred to Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd; sub nom Rubber Improvements Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd (AC) [1964] AC 234 at 262 referred to Nixon v Slater & Gordon (2000) 175 ALR 15 at 23, 23 and 34 referred to John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Kelly (1987) 8 NSWLR 131 referred to Popovic v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd [2002] VSC 220 at pars 50-51 referred to Humphries v TWT Ltd (1993) 120 ALR 693 referred to Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 at 150 referred to Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1964] AC 371 at 396 referred to Carson v John Fairfax & Sons (1993) 178 CLR 44 at 70-71 and 104-105 referred to Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 at 514 referred to Fleming The Law of Torts (9th ed, 1998) at 586, 648, 780, Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort (14th ed, 1994) at 307-308 Gatley on Libel and Slander (9th ed., 1998)at [9.2] Halsbury's Laws of Australia, vol 10, pars [145-835]-[145-845]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate