Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v AG Australia Holdings Ltd (formerly GIO Australia Holdings Ltd)
[2002] FCA 872 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Group proceedings – whether a respondent in group proceedings can communicate with unrepresented members of the group – whether leave or court approval is necessary or desirable before any written communication is sent – whether communication between the respondent and members of the group should only be in writing – whether there is a fiduciary relationship between the solicitors for the representative party and unrepresented members of the representative group. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Group proceedings – settlement of individual claims – whether a respondent in group proceedings can make offers of settlement to individuals in the representative group – whether court involvement or approval is required – whether parties to a proceeding can reach settlement without the involvement of their legal representatives – whether the court can require that a portion of settlement monies be set aside for the payment of the representative party's legal costs – where unrepresented parties have chosen not to retain and sign a fee agreement with the representative party's solicitor. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – legal professional privilege – whether privilege was waived by the representative party's solicitor's reference to their instructions in an affidavit read in Supreme Court proceedings – extent of disclosure – whether it would be unfair to continue to assert the privilege in view of the extent of disclosure. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to use affidavit and notice of motion filed in the Federal Court in contempt proceedings to be commenced in the NSW Supreme Court – whether leave is required – whether the contents of the documents were disclosed for the purposes of O 15 r 18 –whether the respondents wished to use the notice of motion and affidavit "in relation to the litigation in which they were disclosed" – whether anything said or done in Federal Court proceedings is immune from contempt proceedings in another jurisdiction – other issues affecting the exercise of the discretion. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 33V, s 33W, s 33ZF, s 33ZJ, Pt IVA, s 43(1A) Federal Court Rules O 15 r 18 King v GIO Australia Ltd (2000) 100 FCR 209 Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 Sullivan v Pearson; ex parte Morrison (1864) LR 4 QB 153 The Hope (1883) 8 PD 144 Arthur J.S.Hall v Simons [1999] 3 WLR 873 Shepherd v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1996) 20 ACSR 81 McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd (Wilcox J, 27 November 1997, Unreported) Lopez v Star World Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 104 Carnie v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (1995) 182 CLR 398 Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Victoria [2002] HCA 27 King v GIO Australia [2001] FCA 270 Femcare Ltd v Bright (2000) 100 FCR 331 followed Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chats House Investments Pty Ltd (1996) 71 FCR 250 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (1999) 166 ALR 731 Williams v FAI Home Security Pty Ltd (No 4) [2000] FCA 1925 Burns Philp & Co Ltd v Bhagat [1993] 1 VR 203 Qantas Airways Ltd v Cameron (No 3) (1996) 148 ALR 378 Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Central Queensland Cement Pty Ltd v Hardy [1989] 2 Qd R 509 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2000) 96 FCR 317 cited Ainsworth v Burdin [1999] NSWSC 793 cited Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 cited Jamieson v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 574 Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd (1977) 1 QB 881 followed Federal Class Actions, Contingency Fees, Rules Governing Litigation Costs, (1995) 21 Mon LR No 2 p 231 SHANE ROBERT KING v AG AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (FORMERLY GIO AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LTD) (ACN 054 573 401), GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (ACN 050 036 372), DAVID MORTIMER, BRUCE HOGAN, STEWART STEFFEY, RONALD ASHTON, MARINA DARLING, ANDREW KALDOR, LLOYD LANCE, DAVID O'HALLORAN AND IAN POLLARD N 955 OF 1999 MOORE J 11 JULY 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate