Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rubibi v The State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 876 NATIVE TITLE – application for determination of native title – joinder of native title claimants as respondents - whether persons claiming different native title rights and interests to those claimed by the applicants are persons whose interests may be affected by a determination in the proceedings and should be joined as respondents - whether Court has jurisdiction to make a determination of native title in favour of the joined respondents in the absence of an application by them for a determination of native title made in accordance with the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 84(5), 61, 66B and 225
Rubibi Community v Western Australia (2001) 112 FCR 409 – cited Rubibi Community v State of Western Australia [2001] FCA 1553 - cited Yarmirr v Northern Territory (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Olney J, 4 April 1997) - distinguished Western Australia v Ward (2000) 99 FCR 316 - applied Munn v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 486 - cited Britten v State of Western Australia [No 2] [2002] FCA 163 - cited FRANK SEBASTIAN AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE RUBIBI COMMUNITY AND ROSIE CHARLIE ON BEHALF OF THE LANGANDJANO MOB v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS WAG 6006 AND 6238 OF 1998 JUDGE: MERKEL J DATE: 11 JULY 2002 PLACE: MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 6006 AND 6238 OF 1998
BETWEEN: FRANK SEBASTIAN AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE RUBIBI COMMUNITY
FIRST APPLICANTS
ROSIE CHARLIE ON BEHALF OF THE LANGANDJANO MOB
SECOND APPLICANTS
AND: THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 JULY 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate