Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ghannumi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 885
MIGRATION – No appearance by applicant – application dismissed MOHAMAD GHANNUMI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 415 of 2002 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 17 JUNE 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 415 OF 2002
BETWEEN: MOHAMAD GHANNUMI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 JUNE 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 415 OF 2002
BETWEEN: MOHAMAD GHANNUMI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 17 JUNE 2002
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 In this matter the applicant for review has not appeared on two occasions. I have considered the application file together with an affidavit of Mr White, solicitor acting for the respondent, dated 14 June 2002 and the documents attached to that affidavit. I am satisfied that this is a case where I should make an order under O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules dismissing the application and accordingly I order that the application be dismissed. It follows that the applicant should pay the costs of the respondent of and relating to this application. 2 I do mention, however, the provisions of O 35 r 7 of the Federal Court Rules which give the Court power, if an appropriate case is shown, to vary or set aside a judgment where the order has been made in the absence of a party. However, for this rule to come into operation it will normally be the case that the applicant will have to persuade the Court that there are reasonable grounds on which the judgment should be set aside, before leave under this provision can be granted. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate