Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAMU of 2002 v Secretary, Department of Immigration, Indigenous & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 907
MIGRATION – application for declaration that s 196 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) constitutionally invalid as purporting to derogate from jurisdiction vested in Federal Court – determination of separate question. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 189, 196, 198 - 200 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)s 39B Bill of Rights (1866) UK Art 10 Chu Kheng Lim v The Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 applied/distinguished Coco v The Queen (1993/1994) 179 CLR 427 referred to Egan v Willis (1998) 195 CLR 424 referred to R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1992] 1 AC 58 cited Prisoners A - XXX Inclusive v New South Wales (1995) 38 NSWLR 622 cited The Commonwealth and the Central Wool Committee v The Colonial Combing, Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd (1921/1922) 31 CLR 421 referred to
NAMU OF 2002, NAMV OF 2002, NAMW OF 2002, NAMX OF 2002, NAMY OF 2002 AND NAMZ OF 2002 V SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NO. N 636 OF 2002
BEAUMONT ACJ
4 JULY 2002
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 636 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NAMU OF 2002
NAMV OF 2002
NAMW OF 2002
NAMX OF 2002
NAMY OF 2002
NAMZ OF 2002
APPLICANTS
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT ACJ
DATE OF ORDER: 4 JULY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate