Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Evans v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 945
MIGRATION – whether Western Australian Police Service is a gazetted agency under s 503A – whether gazettal notice published by the Minister under s 503A(9) describing the classes of agencies entitled to confidentiality as gazetted agencies is a valid exercise of power – whether the publication of the gazettal notice is an exercise of power of a legislative, rather than an administrative or executive character – whether invalid portions of the gazettal notice may be severed
WORDS AND PHRASES – "specify" – "instrument"
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(2) and 503A Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 46(1)(b) and 46(2)
Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 89 - cited NAAO v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 292 – considered McMorran v A.E. Marrison (Contractors) Ltd [1944] 2 All ER 448 - cited Collector of Customs (NSW) v Lawlor (1979) 24 ALR 307 - cited Azevedo v Secretary, Department of Primary Industries and Energy (1992) 106 ALR 683 – considered The Queen v Hamilton Knight; Ex parte The Commonwealth Steamship Owners Association (1952) 86 CLR 283 - cited Australian Capital Equity Pty Ltd v Beale (1993) 41 FCR 242 – cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sharma (1999) 90 FCR 513 - cited Dutton v Republic of South Africa (1999) 162 ALR 625 – cited Edenmead Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1984) 4 FCR 348 – cited Blackpool Corporation v Locker [1948] 1 K.B. 349 – cited Minister for Industry and Commerce v Tooheys Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 260 - considered Harrington v Lowe (1996) 190 CLR 311 – applied Concord Council v Optus Networks Pty Ltd (1996) 90 LGERA 232 - cited Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Consumer Commission (2000) 173 ALR 362 - cited Telstra Corporation Ltd v Seven Cable Television Pty Ltd (2000) 102 FCR 517 – cited Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner (1995) 183 CLR 323 - applied Pidoto v Victoria (1943) 68 CLR 87 – cited Department of Premier v Birrell (No 2) [1990] VR 51 - cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate