Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA 948
INDUSTRIAL LAW – application pursuant to s 209 of Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – applicant seeks orders prohibiting publication of evidence in proceeding – principles governing such orders under s 50 of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – National Council of Union proposes to hear charges against applicant – applicant claims resolutions of National Council invalid – application for interim orders under s 209(4) – whether serious question to be tried – whether balance of convenience favours grant of interim orders. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 50 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 209(4) Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 at 435, 437, 438 and 439 referred to Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Ltd [1979] AC 440 at 449-450 referred to E v Australian Red Cross Society (1991) 27 FCR 310 at 313 considered Versace v Monte [2001] FCA 1565 considered John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal (NSW) (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 at 476-477 referred to John Fairfax Group v Local Court of NSW (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 at 141 and 161 referred to Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Jones [1985] 2 NSWLR 47 referred to Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 considered Computer Interchange Pty Ltd v Microsoft Corporation (1999) 88 FCR 438 considered R v G (1984) 12 A Crim R 189 referred to R v Hermes; Ex Parte V [1963] SASR 81 at 84 referred to McGee v Sanders (No 2) (1991) 32 FCR 397 at 402-403 referred to Adlam v Noack (1998) 90 IR 31 at 34-35 considered Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA 634 par 30 considered Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 at 388-389 referred to Hansch v Transport Workers' Union of Australia [1998] 14 FCA (25 May 1998) referred to Campbell v Higgins (1957) 3 FLR 317 referred to Ephstathis v The Greek Orthodox Community of St George (1998) 13 ACLR 691 referred to McMahon v Gould (1982) 1 ACLC 98 referred to Cameron's Unit Services Pty Ltd v Whelpton & Associates Pty Ltd (1984) 59 ALR 754 referred to Philippine Airlines v Goldair (Aust) Pty Ltd [1990] VR 385 referred to Cains v Jenkins (1979) 42 FLR 188 referred to Australian Workers' Union v Bowen (No 2) (1948) 77 CLR 601 referred to Joyce v Christoffersen (1990) 26 FCR 261 at 262 and 292 referred to Whittle v The Australian Miniature Pony Society Incorporated (1995) 57 FCR 252 at 268-270 referred to Dodd v Johnston (1999) 91 IR 352 referred to Adlam v Bauer (1999) 93 IR 114 referred to Haritou v Skourdoumbis [2002] FCA 116 at para 13 referred to Jia v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 178 ALR 421 referred to Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464 referred to Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board (1972) 128 CLR 509 referred to Nicholson v Pitt (unreported, Industrial Relations Court of Australia, 15 November 1995) at p 13 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate