Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v INFO4PC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949
CONTEMPT OF COURT – nature of contempt – standard of proof – relevance of intent – whether first respondent committed contempt of court in failing to comply with orders restraining it from advertising on a website – nature of "advertising" CONTEMPT OF COURT – whether first and second respondents each committed second contempt of court in failing to comply with orders restraining them from making certain withdrawals from accounts with financial institutions – whether receipt of cash from staff after cashing of wages cheques constitutes "cash withdrawal" – whether second respondent was director or de facto director of first respondent SENTENCING – contempt of court – rationale of sentence – seriousness of a contempt – intent of contemnor The Constitution s 71 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 60(1)(a), 60(1)(b) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79 Criminal Code (WA) s 7 Federal Court Rules O 40 r 6 and r 8 Borrie et al The Law of Contempt 3rd ed. 1996 at pp 559 – 560 Miller Contempt of Court 3rd ed. 2000 at p 672 Oxford English Dictionary, vol.1, p 138 The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993) pp 32, 1671 - 2 The Macquarie Dictionary, 2nd ed. pp 70, 23 – 24, 1074 Walker The Oxford Companion to Law Clarendon Press 1980 at p 35 Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) HCA 57 referred to Morris v Crown Office (1970) 2 QB 114 referred to Australasian Meat Industries Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 applied Trade Practices Commission v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (Beaumont J, 9 August 1995, unreported) referred to Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 referred to Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 applied Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1758 considered Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd v Plumbers and Gasfitters Employees Union (No 2) (1987) 15 FCR 64 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hughes [2001] FCA 38 discussed Re Garage Equipment Association's Agreement (1964) LR 4 RP 491 referred to Coward v Stapleton (1953) 90 CLR 573 followed Stancomb v Trowbridge Urban District Council [1910] 2 Ch 190 followed Rothmans of Pall Mall v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1985) 5 FCR 330 followed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Rotary Offset Press Pty Ltd (1971) 45 ALJR 518 approved by the High Court (1972) 46 ALJR 609 followed Al Hayat Publishing Co Ltd v Ahmed Sokarno Eman Mohamed (Tamberlin J, 28 February 1997, unreported) followed Harmsworth v Harmsworth [1987] 1 WLR 1676 referred to Hersfield Developments Corporation Pty Ltd v Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (1981) 46 LGRA 180 considered Re Media Council of Australia and others (1996) ATPR 41-497 referred to Re Media Council of Australia Authorisation; Re Australian Consumer's Association Application (1987) 88 FLR 1 referred to Director of Public Prosecutions v United Telecasters Ltd (1990) 168 CLR 594 referred to Export Development Grants Board v Geoffrey Thompson and Growers Co-operative Company Pty Ltd (1985) 6 AAR 276 distinguished Ex parte Tziniolis; Re Harvey (1959) 76 WN (NSW) 686 referred to Hoover Co (Australia) Pty Ltd v Spackman (1998) 162 ALR 215 referred to Queensland Television Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 17 FCR 246 referred to Windsurfing International Inc v Sailboards Australia Pty Ltd (1986) 19 FCR 110 followed Z Ltd v A-Z & AA-LL [1982] 1 QB 558 referred to James v Robinson (1963) 109 CLR 593 referred to John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd v McRae (1955) 93 CLR 351 referred to Richborough Furniture Ltd [1996] BCLC 507 referred to McCarthy v Wheeler (Hedigan J, 16 September 1998, unreported) referred to Chang Hang Kiu v Piggott [1909] AC 312 referred to ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 referred to Australian Securities Investments Commission v Matthews (1999) 32 ACSR 404 referred to Re Bramblevale Ltd [1970] 1 Ch 128 referred to Natcomp Technology Australia Pty Ltd v Graiche (2001) 19 ACLC 1117 discussed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Austin (1998) 16 ACLC 1555; (1998) 28 ACSR 565 followed Patrick Walker, Commissioner for Fair Trading v Info4pc.com Pty Ltd [2000] WASC 212 considered Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 followed Gallagher v Durack (1983) 152 CLR 238 referred to Flamingo Park Pty Ltd v Dolly Dolly Creation Pty Ltd (1985) 5 FCR 169 followed Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Goldstar Corp Pty Ltd (Drummond J, 6 November 1998, unreported) referred to Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] 1 AC 191 referred to McNair Anderson Associates Pty Ltd v Hinch [1985] VR 309 referred to Degman Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 considered Hinch v Attorney-General (1987) 164 CLR 15 referred to Australian Industry Group v Automotive Food Metals Engineering Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2000] FCA 708 referred to BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2002] FCA 792 followed Marron v Salvemini; Re Scardigno [1969] WAR 178 referred to Sunibrite Products (Australia) Pty Ltd v Jabuna Pty Ltd (1980) 47 FLR 73 referred to In the Will of Mary Johnson (1907) 24 WN(NSW) 124 referred to Attorney General v Walthamstow Urban District Council (1895) 11 TLR 533 referred to Lee v Aylesbury Urban District Council (1902) 19 TLR 106 referred to Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 179 ALR 406 referred to AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v INFO4PC.COM PTY LTD and JAMES RAE S 17 of 2001 RD NICHOLSON J 31 JULY 2002 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate