NAMU of 2002 v Secretary, Department of Immigration Indigenous & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 961

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NAMU of 2002 v Secretary, Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 961

COSTS – whether ordinary rule that costs follow the event should apply. Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 cited X v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 93 distinguished Milne v Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania (1956) 95 CLR 460 cited Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 cited

NAMU OF 2002, NAMV OF 2002, NAMW OF 2002, NAMX OF 2002, NAMY OF 2002 AND NAMZ OF 2002 V SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

NO. N 636 OF 2002

BEAUMONT ACJ

6 AUGUST 2002

SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 636 OF 2002

BETWEEN: NAMU OF 2002

NAMV OF 2002

NAMW OF 2002

NAMX OF 2002

NAMY OF 2002

NAMZ OF 2002

APPLICANTS

AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE: BEAUMONT ACJ

DATE OF ORDER: 6 AUGUST 2002

WHERE MADE: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. NAMY and NAMZ (the fourth and fifth named applicants, respectively), and NAMX (the Tutor for the first three named applicants) pay the respondents' costs.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 636 OF 2002

BETWEEN: NAMU OF 2002

NAMV OF 2002

NAMW OF 2002

NAMX OF 2002