Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ngu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 998 MIGRATION – deportation – whether application seeking review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming deportation order is competent – application filed on 2 November 2001 – whether Tribunal decision a "privative clause decision" – whether preclusion of appeal invalid for retrospectivity – whether preclusion of appeal beyond competence of Commonwealth Parliament – whether preclusion of appeal contrary to international conventions
The Constitution s 51 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 8, 8(c) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975(Cth) s 44 Judiciary Act 1906 (Cth) s 39B, 78B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 200, 201, 474(2), 474(3), 474(4) and (5), 475A, 477(1), 477(2), 478, 483 Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Sch 1 item 8(2), 8(3) Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth) s 39 Mezbur v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 165 considered Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Limited (1995) 183 CLR 168 referred to R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 referred to Tuitupou v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 60 ALD 361 referred to R v Kidman (1915) 20 CLR 425 referred to Polyukhovich v The Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501 referred to Algama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 476 undisturbed on appeal at [2001] FCA 1884 referred to Yao v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1996) 69 FCR 583 followed Mahboob v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (No 2) (1996) 65 FCR 248 referred to Abidin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 842 followed Abidin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 54 followed Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 83 followed Oguzhan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 99 FCR 285 followed Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 followed HUNG THE NGU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 483 of 2001 RD NICHOLSON J 13 AUGUST 2002 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate