Farrington v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1013

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Farrington v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1013

practice and procedure –appeal from judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court – whether interlocutory – application for leave to appeal and for an extension of time within which to appeal – nature of appeal – whether alleged conflict of interest of respondent's counsel relevant on appeal

Low v Commonwealth of Australia [2001] FCA 702 cited Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 174 ALR 585 cited Allesch v Maunz (2000) 173 ALR 648 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Jia (2001) 178 ALR 421 cited CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 cited Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) (1987) 76 ALR 137 applied Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied House v The King (1936) 55 CLR applied Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation v Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621 applied Adamopoulos v Olympic Airways SA (1990) 95 ALR referred Bomanite Pty Ltd v Slatex Corp Aust Pty Ltd (1991) 104 ALR 165 referred Hindmarsh Medical Clinic v Hindmarsh Family Practice Pty Ltd (1997) 38 IPR 616 referred Londish v Gulf Pacific Pty Limited (1993) 45 FCR 128 referred Emerson v Wreckair Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 581 cited Re Frank; Ex parte Pilisky (1987) 16 FCR 396 cited Guss v Johnston [2000] FCA 1455 referred McVeigh v Linen House Pty Ltd [1999] 3 VR 394 referred Spincode Pty Ltd v Look Software Pty Ltd[2001] VSCA 248 cited Waiviata Pty Ltd v Millenium Publications Pty Ltd[2002] FCA 98 cited Mintel International Group Ltd v Mintel (Australia) Pty Ltd(2000) 181 ALR 78 cited Watson v Watson (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales (Eq), Santow J, 25 May 1998 (BC9802673)) cited DEREK FARRINGTON v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V 1186 of 2001 KENNY J 13 AUGUST 2002 MELBOURNE