Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QAAD of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1038 MIGRATION - privative clause decision - refusal of protection visa by Refugee Review Tribunal – matter remitted to tribunal by single judge of the federal court – whether tribunal obliged to consider matter afresh – whether failure to consider matter afresh constitutes jurisdictional error or alternatively, failure to give bona fide consideration to matter – whether unclear which of previous findings Tribunal intended to adhere to – whether circumstances give rise to a 'jurisdictional factors' question - whether tribunal required to ask 'what if I am wrong' in every case and where no real doubt STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - interpretation of privative clauses Statutes Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91S, 474, 424 Cases Awan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 594 Cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719 Applied NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs and Turcan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 Applied R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox (1945) 70 CLR 598 Applied Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2000] FCA 167 Applied QAAD OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Q57 of 2002 KIEFEL J 30 SEPTEMBER 2002 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q57 OF 2002
BETWEEN: QAAD OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 SEPTEMBER 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate