Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anstis v Secretary of the Department of Family & Community Services [2002] FCA 1043 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – notice of objection to competency – application for review contesting a departmental instruction relating to the relinquishment of control of private trusts – Part 3.18 of the Social Security Act – whether applicant has standing to seek declaratory and injunctive relief – applicant advisor on social security matters – where applicant claims that the instruction is wrong at law – whether claimed professional and economic interest a sufficient material interest for standing
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1A) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), Part 3.18 Australian Conservation Foundation v The Commonwealth (1980) 146 CLR 493 applied Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Secretary, Department of Transport (1986) 13 FCR 124 referred Bateman's Bay Local Aboriginal Land Council v The Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund Pty Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 247 applied Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd (1981) 149 CLR 27 applied Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800; at first instance, [1981] 1 All ER 545 distinguished Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112 distinguished Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2001) 189 ALR 109 referred Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 referred Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 referred Ogle v Strickland (1987) 13 FCR 306 distinguished Maritime Union of Australia v Anderson (2000) 100 FCR 58 followed BGL Corporate Solutions Pty Ltd v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (1999) 55 ALD 643 referred Corio Bay and District Private Hospital NH Pty Ltd v Minister for Family Services (1998) 157 ALR 181 referred Big Country Developments Pty Limited v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (1995) 60 FCR 85 referred Yates Security Services Pty Ltd v Keating (1990) 25 FCR 1 discussed MICHAEL ANSTIS v SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES V 22 of 2002 KENNY J 22 AUGUST 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate