Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gray v Associated Book Publishers (Aust) Pty Limited [2002] FCA 1045
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - discovery - discretionary power of Court - whether disclosure necessary in the interests of a fair trial - claim of irrelevance with respect to part of a document - whether parts of discovered documents may be masked for confidentiality - whether claim for legal professional privilege "sufficiently stated the grounds of the privilege" - whether legal professional privilege waived by limited disclosure - whether further discovery should be required
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - whether question of liability should be tried separately from question of damages – statutory and common law claims
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Federal Court Rules O 15 r 6(4), O 15 r11, O 15 r 15, O 29 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 122
Trade Practices Commission v CC (New South Wales) Pty Limited (1995) 58 FCR 426 cited Harman v Secretary of State for Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 referred to Mackay Sugar Co-operative Association Limited v CSR Limited (1996) 63 FCR 408 referred to Science Research Council v Nasse [1980] AC 102 cited Grofam Pty Limited v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (1993) 43 FCR 408 cited Optus Communications Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [1995] FCA 254 cited GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 593 cited Fort Dodge Australia Pty Limited v Nature Vet Pty Limited [2002] FCA 501 cited GE Capital Corporate Finance Group Ltd v Bankers Trust Co [1995] 1 WLR 172 (CA) cited Telstra Corporation v Australis Media Holdings (McLelland CJ in Eq, 10 February 1997, unreported) referred to Index Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Nolan [2002] FCA 608 referred to Mulley v Mainfold (1959) 103 CLR 341 cited Esso Australia Resources Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 cited Attorney‑General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 referred to Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83 referred to Southern Cross Airlines Holdings Ltd (in liq) v Arthur Andersen & Co (1998) 84 FCR 472 cited Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 cited Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 (FC) referred to Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 (CA) cited BEATRICE ANNE GRAY v ASSOCIATED BOOK PUBLISHERS (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQ.) formerly THE LAW BOOK COMPANY LIMITED t/as LBC Information Services AND THOMSON LEGAL & REGULATORY LIMITED t/as Lawbook Co (formerly t/as LBC Information Services) N 929 of 2001 BRANSON J 23 AUGUST 2002 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate