Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1047 MIGRATION – refugee – protection visa application – Refugee Review Tribunal – Iranian national – alleged fear of persecution for anti-government activities in Iran – claims disbelieved by Tribunal – grounds of review – bad faith – breach of essential precondition – failing to take into account relevant considerations – operation of privative clause – no bad faith case – breach of s 424A precluded from review by privative clause – failure to take into account relevant consideration precluded – application dismissed. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 cited R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 cited WACO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W557 OF 2002 FRENCH J 21 AUGUST 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W557 OF 2002
BETWEEN: WACO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 AUGUST 2002
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W557 OF 2002
BETWEEN: WACO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate