Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sluggett v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [2002] FCA 1060
COSTS - no special rule in proceedings for judicial review of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commissioner's decision in discrimination proceedings that unsuccessful applicant is not to bear the successful respondent's costs
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), s 23 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth), s 79 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth), s 46PO Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 85A Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), s 347
Ruddock v Vadarlis (2001) 188 ALR 143 discussed Tadawan v State of South Australia [2001] FMCA 25 referred to Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 discussed Physical Disability Council of New South Wales v Sydney City Council [1999] FCA 815 referred to CHANDRAKANTHI SLUGGETT v HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and FLINDERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA S 92 OF 2000
DRUMMOND J 26 AUGUST 2002 BRISBANE (VIA VIDEO LINK TO ADELAIDE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 92 OF 2000
BETWEEN: CHANDRAKANTHI SLUGGETT
APPLICANT
AND: HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
FLINDERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DRUMMOND J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 AUGUST 2002
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE (VIA VIDEO LINK TO ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, including reserved costs, fixed in the sum of $5,000.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 92 OF 2000
BETWEEN: CHANDRAKANTHI SLUGGETT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate