Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Companies Auditors & Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2002] FCA 1066
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v COMPANIES AUDITORS & LIQUIDATORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD & ANOR
N 1039 of 2001
LINDEN JOHN GULSON v COMPANIES AUDITORS & LIQUIDATORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD & ANOR
N 3001 of 2001
WHITLAM J
28 AUGUST 2002
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 1039 of 2001 BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND
INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: COMPANIES AUDITORS AND
LIQUIDATORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD
FIRST RESPONDENT
LINDEN JOHN GULSON
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 AUGUST 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the first respondent made on 27 June 2001 is set aside.
2. The application by the applicant for the second respondent to be dealt with under s 1292 of the Corporations Act 2001 is referred to the first respondent for further consideration according to law.
3. The second respondent is to pay the applicant's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 3001 of 2001
BETWEEN: LINDEN JOHN GULSON
AND: APPLICANT
COMPANIES AUDITORS AND
LIQUIDATORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD
FIRST RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate