SBAT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1077
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SBAT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2002] FCA 1077
SBAT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
S.240 of 2001
MANSFIELD J
13 SEPTEMBER 2002
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S.240 OF 2001
BETWEEN: SBAT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 SEPTEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal given on 11 December 2001 is null and void.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S.240 OF 2001
BETWEEN: SBAT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE: 13 SEPTEMBER 2002
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 This is an application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) to have declared null and void a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) given on 11 December 2001. The Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the respondent refusing to grant to the applicant a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
2 The applicant is the 22 year old son of Iranian parents, who themselves applied for a protection visa under the Act on the same day and with the same result. His 19 year old brother also applied for a protection visa in the same circumstances.
3 The parties are agreed that the outcome of this application should be the same as the application before the Court under s 39B of the Judiciary Act in which the applicant's parents and his younger brother is addressed: SBAU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1076. I have delivered judgment in that matter today.
4 For the reasons set out in that judgment, in my view the application should be allowed.
5 I accordingly declare that the decision of the Tribunal given on 11 December 2001 is null and void. I give leave to the parties to seek such further or consequential orders as they may be advised.
I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Mansfield.
Associate:
Dated: 9 September 2002
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms AM Sheehan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Galbally Rolfe
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms S Maharaj
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Date of Hearing: 24 May 2002
Date of Judgment: 13 September 2002
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.