Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Tea Tree Oil Research Institute v Industry Research & Development Board [2002] FCA 1127 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision not to register applicant as registered research agency – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in finding eligibility for registration to be determined at date application was made – criteria to be met for registration contained in instrument published in Gazette – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in confining assessment of criteria to be met for registration – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred identifying the criteria for registration – whether compliance with criteria sufficient to entitle registration – whether discretion existed to enable registration where criteria not satisfied – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in construing criteria
Industry Research and Development Act 1986 (Cth), ss 3, 39C, 39F, 39G Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 73B(1B) and 73B(13) Commonwealth of Australia Gazette 1995, no. GN 16, 26 April Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15AA and s 46A Industry Research and Development Amendment Act 1995 (Cth), s 4(1)(b) Research and Development Legislation Amendment Bill 1988, Explanatory Memorandum, par 43(f) Comptroller-General of Customs v Akai Pty Limited (1994) 50 FCR 511, referred to Jebb v Repatriation Commission (1988) 80 ALR 329, referred to Ward v Williams (1955) 92 CLR 496, referred to King Gee Clothing Company Proprietary Limited v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 184, referred to Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Limited (1996) 186 CLR 389, referred to Gill v Donald Humberstone & Co. Ltd. [1963] 3 All ER 180, applied Langton v Independent Commission Against Corruption (2000)49 NSWLR 164, referred to Melbourne Pathology Pty Ltd v Minister for Human Services and Health (1996) 40 ALD 565, referred to CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Lim (2001) 112 FCR 589, referred to Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297, referred to Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280, referred to Industry Research and Development Board v Bridgestone Australia Ltd (2001) 109 FCR 564, followed Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280, referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate