Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ng v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1146 MIGRATION – application for review – natural justice – whether visa applicant entitled to hearing under common law procedural fairness – where statute purports to exhaustively state procedural fairness requirements – error of law – whether error of law made by tribunal is reviewable by Court – where privative clause decision – application of Hickman conditions – whether decision reviewable when no allegation of bad faith made Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 359, 359A, 359C, 360, 474(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
NAAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 considered Hashimi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 988 considered NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 followed R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 applied NAAG of 2002 v MIMIA [2002] FCA 713 considered Turcan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 considered TEE SENG NG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Q 68 OF 2002 DOWSETT J 16 SEPTEMBER 2002 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 68 OF 2002
BETWEEN: TEE SENG NG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 SEPTEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent in the proceedings, including reserved costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 68 OF 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate