Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Daniel v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1147 NATIVE TITLE – application to replace applicants in claimant application – whether certain applicants no longer authorised by native title claimant groups – failure to execute future act agreement with State notwithstanding resolutions of native title claim group – authorisation of proposed replacement applicants – whether decision-making process according to traditional law and custom – whether other decision-making process – discretion to replace applicant. Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 61(4) s 66B s 251B s 253
Western Australia v Strickland (2000) 99 FCR 33 cited Strickland v Native Title Registrar (1999) 168 ALR 242 cited Moran v Minister of Land & Water Conservation for NSW [1999] FCA 1637 discussed Johnson, in the matter of Lawson v Lawson [2001] FCA 894 cited Duren v Kiama Council [2001] FCA 1363 cited Quandamooka People # 1 v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 259 cited Ward v Northern Territory [2002] FCA 171 cited DAVID DANIEL AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE NGARLUMA PEOPLE AND BRUCE MONADEE AND OTHERS FOR THE YINDJIBARNDI PEOPLE v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS WAG 6017 OF 1996 Part WAG 127 of 1997 and Part WAG 6256 of 1998 FRENCH J 13 SEPTEMBER 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 6017 OF 1996
And part of
WAG 127 OF 1997
And Part of
WAG 6256 OF 1998
BETWEEN: DAVID DANIEL AND OTHERS FOR THE NGARLUMA PEOPLE AND BRUCE MONADEE AND OTHERS FOR THE YINDJIBARNDI PEOPLE
First Applicants
And
VALERIE HOLBOROW (NEE COSMOS) AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE YABURARA AND MARDUDHUNERA PEOPLE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate