Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Toben [2002] FCA 1150 HUMAN RIGHTS AND DISCRIMINATION LAW – racial discrimination – racial vilification – proceedings to enforce determination of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission – hearing de novo of original complaint – representative claim – necessity for class to be closed – entitlement of applicant alone to institute proceeding - whether Jews in Australia constitute a group of people with common "ethnic origin" – whether non-password protected website caused material to be 'communicated to the public' – meanings of the words offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate – ordinary meaning –- whether publication of material on website reasonably likely to offend or intimidate Jews in Australia – objective test – real effects - whether "ethnic origin" one factor in the content of material on website RACIAL VILIFICATION – applicable principles in determining whether material reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate – principles of defamation – objective test - whether imputations would be conveyed to an ordinary reasonable reader PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court Rules – summary judgment – repeated failure of respondent to file a defence – respondent unwilling to cooperate in bringing proceeding to trial RELIEF – injunctions – utility of injunction to restrain Internet publication – whether apology or retraction should be ordered WORDS AND PHRASES – "likely", "offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate", "because of" Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) ss 18C, 18D, 22, 25L, 25Y, 25Z, 25ZC Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 1999 (Cth) Part 2 ss 4‑22 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 8(e) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 ss 46PQ, 46PR and 46PT Federal Court RulesO 4 r 3(1)(b), O 10 r 7, O 11 r 23, O 19, O 20 r 1 Executive Council of Australian Jewry v Scully (1998) 79 FCR 537 cited Jones v Scully [2001] FCA 879 cited Fisher v Rural Adjustment & Finance Corporation of Western Australia (1995) 57 FCR 1 referred to Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 cited Citron v Zündel (No. 4) (2002), 41 C.H.R.R. D/274 (C.H.R.T.) referred to Miller v Wertheim [2002] FCAFC 156 cited Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080 cited and followed Tilmanns Butcheries Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (1979) 42 FLR 331 followed Creek v Cairns Post Pty Ltd (2001) 112 FCR 352 cited and followed Vincent v Peacock [1973] 1 NSWLR 466 at 468 referred to The Macquarie Dictionary 2nd ed and The Oxford English Dictionary 2nd ed JEREMY JONES v FREDRICK TOBEN N 327 OF 2001 BRANSON J 17 SEPTEMBER 2002 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate