Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAML v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1190 MIGRATION – application for protection visa refused – Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed decision of Minister – applicant is Iranian national who undertook studies in Russia – claim by applicant that he became an Evangelical Christian and that he was vilified by Orthodox Christians and Iranians because of his religion – witness provided evidence to the Refugee Review Tribunal in support of applicant's claims – Refugee Review Tribunal rejected claims by applicant having regard to inconsistencies in evidence before it – applicant submitted that Refugee Review Tribunal erred in failing to consider evidence of witness – consideration of analysis of witness' evidence by Refugee Review Tribunal – whether Refugee Review Tribunal ignored evidence provided by applicant's witness MIGRATION – application of s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) had there been a failure to take into account evidence provided by witness – absence of express condition precedent – whether breach of inviolable limitation – whether a bona fide exercise of power
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 414, 424 and 474 NAAA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 362 followed NAAV v The Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 followed R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232 discussed R v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387 referred to Reg. v Commonwealth Industrial Court Judges; Ex parte Cocks (1968) 121 CLR 313 referred to NAAG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713 referred to Little v The Commonwealth (1947) 75 CLR 94 discussed Spooner v Juddow (1850) 4 Moo. Ind. App 353 discussed Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 referred to NAML v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 616 of 2002 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 27 SEPTEMBER 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate