Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1201
MIGRATION – refusal of protection visa by Refugee Review Tribunal – judicial review – alleged failure on part of Tribunal to consider particular aspect of applicant's claim – whether jurisdictional error – privative clause decision – whether alleged error falls within Hickmanprinciples – whether transgression of "inviolable limitation or restraint on power"
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 474(1)
R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 at 615-616 referred to NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 at par [10] applied R v Coldham; Ex parte The Australian Workers' Union (1983) 153 CLR 415 at 419 referred to SBAB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 161 at [30] referred to Ahvazi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 279 referred to VAJ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENEOUS AFFAIRS V1101 OF 2001 WEINBERG J 27 SEPTEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1101 OF 2002
BETWEEN: VAJ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 SEPTEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1101 OF 2002
BETWEEN: VAJ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate