Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Domestic Violence Crisis Service Inc [2002] FCA 1227 COSTS – application by respondent for costs certificate pursuant to s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) – principal proceedings concerned decision of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission – application allowed and decision of Commission set aside– all parties ordered to pay their own costs of the proceedings – whether respondent is eligible for costs certificate – whether proceedings are a Federal appeal – possible question for law reform Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) ss 3, 6, 14 Kowalski v Domestic Violence Crisis Service Inc [2001] FCA 1082, referred to Bullock v Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No. 2) (1984-85) 58 ALR 373, referred to IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A COSTS CERTIFICATE UNDER s 6 OF THE FEDERAL PROCEEDINGS (COSTS) ACT 1981 (CTH) STAN LECK KOWALSKI v DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICE INC & ANOR A 59 of 2000 MADGWICK J 2 OCTOBER 2002 SYDNEY (IN CHAMBERS)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY A 59 OF 2002
BETWEEN: STAN LECK KOWALSKI
APPLICANT
AND: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICE INC
FIRST RESPONDENT
HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK
DATE OF ORDER: 2 OCTOBER 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (IN CHAMBERS)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for a costs order under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY A 59 OF 2002
BETWEEN: STAN LECK KOWALSKI
APPLICANT
AND: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICE INC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate