Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1242 MIGRATION – error of law – Family visa – "special need relative" – whether Migration Review Tribunal erred in considering that the fact that the nominator was a very young child was insufficient to constitute a "serious circumstance" giving rise to a "permanent or long term need for assistance". MIGRATION – procedural fairness – Migration Review Tribunal promises a further oral hearing but fails to provide the hearing – whether hearing would have made a difference to the outcome – whether relief should be granted. MIGRATION – privative clause – s 474(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether privative clause validates a decision affected by error of law and denial of procedural fairness.
Constitution, s 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 359A, 359B, 474 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 1.03, cll 806.213, 806.221 Wu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 642, cited. Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 39, followed. NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228, followed. Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, cited. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323, cited. Huang v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 71 FCR 95, cited. Re Refugee Review Tribunal, Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, followed. R v Ross-Jones; Ex parte Green (1984) 156 CLR 185, cited. Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] AC 808, followed. Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141, cited. Zahid v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1108, followed. Rv Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598, followed. O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232, cited. R v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387, cited. NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713, cited. Daihatsu Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 184 ALR 576, cited. SAAG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 547, distinguished. Kan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 923, distinguished. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 187 ALR 117, distinguished. Re The Australian Bank Employees Union; Ex parte Citicorp Australia Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 513, cited. GUI RONG WU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 234 of 2001 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 10 OCTOBER 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate