Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 1251 PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – strike out application – claim by unlawful non-citizen in respect of injuries sustained while in detention – allegation that respondents breached implied constitutional principles of equality before the law and equal access to the law – whether such claims disclose no reasonable cause of action – whether pleading as a whole should be struck out.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 198(5) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 75B, 82, 86A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), s 42 Commonwealth Places (Application of Laws) Act 1970 (Cth), s 4(1) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 5(4) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 44, 143 Federal Court Rules, O 11 rr 2,16 Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 667, cited. Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 181, cited. Philipps v Philipps (1878) 4 QBD 127, cited. Trade Practices Commission v David Jones (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 7 FCR 109, cited. Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, followed. Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1, followed. Corrections Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2000) 104 FCR 448, cited. Brambles Holdings Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1979) 28 ALR 191, cited. Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons (1993) 46 FCR 225, cited. LIANG WEI LI v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ORS N 428 of 2002 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 10 OCTOBER 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 428 OF 2002
BETWEEN: LIANG WEI LI
APPLICANT
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN CORRECTIONAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate