Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Howard v National Bank of New Zealand Limited [2002] FCA 1257
PROCEDURE – service of originating process outside jurisdiction – respondents in New Zealand instructed their New Zealand solicitors to accept service in New Zealand of Federal Court process – service out of jurisdiction within O 7 r 14 – leave in respect of O 8 not required PROCEDURE – jurisdiction of Federal Court over proceeding – whether statutory pre-conditions to the invocation of the Court's jurisdiction existed – jurisdiction conferred by s 86 the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – jurisdiction conferred by s 39B(1A)(c) the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – what is pleaded is not decisive of the Court's jurisdiction
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 5(1), 51AA, 51AB, 52, 60, 86 Financial Sector Reform (Consequential Amendments) Act 1998 (Cth) Pt II Div 2 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 2(2), Sch 2 Federal Court Rules O 7 r 1(1), O 7 r 8, O 7 r 14, O 8 r 1(f), O 8 r 2
Laurie v Carroll (1958) 98 CLR 310 followed Kenneth Allison Ltd v AE Limehouse & Co [1992] 2 AC 105 discussed Sphere Drake Insurance Plc v Gunes Sigorta [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 139 referred to Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Co v Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1889) 60 LT 924 cited Montgomery, Jones & Co v Liebenthal & Co [1898] 1 QB 487 cited Reversionary Interest Society Ltd v Locking [1928] WN 227 cited Manta Line Inc v Seraphim Sofiantes & Midland Bank Plc [1984] 1 Lloyd's Rep 14 referred to SCF Finance Co Ltd v Masri (No 3) [1987] 1 All ER 194 referred to Delco Australia Pty Ltd v Equipment Enterprises Incorporated (2000) 100 FCR 385 not followed Rein v Stein (1892) 66 LT 469 cited Boyle v Sacker (1888) 39 Ch D 249 cited Mondial Trading Pty Ltd v Interocean Marine Transport Inc (1985) 65 ALR 155 at 157 cited Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 at 570-571 applied Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 190 ALR 1 followed Elders Ltd v Swinbank (1999) 96 FCR 303 at 308, par [18] cited Australian Solar Mesh Sales Pty Ltd v Anderson (2000) 101 FCR 1 at 9 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate