Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vasram v AMP Life Limited [2002] FCA 1286 COSTS – indemnity costs – factors to be taken into account in the award of indemnity costs – whether history of matter disclosed special or unusual features so as to warrant award of indemnity costs for whole or part of proceedings – applicant previously given leave to file fifth amended statement of claim – statement of claim sought to reagitate issues previously decided – statement of claim struck out and proceedings dismissed – whether respondent should have had to incur costs of responding to fifth statement of claim – whether applicant's solicitor should bear part of award of indemnity costs – circumstances in which appropriate to make costs order against applicant's solicitor Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules O 62 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 referred to Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685 referred to NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 2) (2001) 109 FCR 77 referred to Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 referred to Knight v FP Special Assets Limited (1992) 174 CLR 178 referred to De Sousa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 544 referred to Cook v Pasminco Ltd (No 2) (2000) 107 FCR 44 applied Levick v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 102 FCR 155 applied Re Bendeich (No 2) (1994) 53 FCR 422 applied Assaf v Skalkos [2000] NSWSC 935 distinguished Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 referred to Waiviata Pty Ltd v New Millenium Publications Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 481 referred to Hamod v State of New South Wales [2002] FCAFC 97 referred to Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 referred to Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1996) 138 ALR 425 referred to Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2002] FCA 192 applied McKerlie v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2000] NSWSC 1159 referred to Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Amcor Printing Papers Group Ltd [2000] FCA 163 referred to John S Hayes & Associates Pty Limited v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Limited (1994) 52 FCR 201 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate