Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Dept of Family & Community Services v Hocking [2002] FCA 1328
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – decision under Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – whether error of law in determination that debt "attributable solely to an administrative error" of the Commonwealth – whether error of law in determination that respondent had made "false statement" in reporting family income Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 506D, 1075, 1223(5), 1224, 1237A Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44
Haldane-Stevenson v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 21 cited Secretary, Department of Social Security v Garvey (1989) 22 FCR 132 cited McAuliffe v Department of Social Security (1993) 23 ALD 284 cited Re Department of Social Security v Hoy (1998) 52 ALD 477 cited Hazim v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (2002) 34 AAR 458 cited SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES V FRANCIS JOHN HOCKING NO. N 211 OF 2002 BEAUMONT J 30 OCTOBER 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 211 OF 2002
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
APPLICANT
AND: FRANCIS JOHN HOCKING
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 OCTOBER 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for reconsideration and determination according to law. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 211 OF 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate