Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WABZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1345
MIGRATION – protection visa – judicial review – privative clause decision – Tribunal wrongly excluded Legal Aid WA solicitor from appearing before it on behalf of applicant – applicant's case prepared on basis that she would be allowed legal representation at the hearing – solicitor sought to intervene later during hearing and was told (again wrongly) that her status was only that of an observer who could stay and take notes – respondent conceded Tribunal's legal error in this regard – several weeks after hearing, applicant's social worker wrote to Tribunal referring to her emotional distress and requesting indication as to when the Tribunal would make its decision – member instructed Tribunal staff to advise social worker that he hoped "to sign a decision" by week-ending 21 September 2001 – staff member of Tribunal advised social worker that date for decision would be about 21 September 2001 – decision made on 24 September 2001, but not notified to applicant until 19 October 2001 – in the meantime rights of review severely curtailed by amending legislation taking effect from 2 October 2001 – whether bad faith established – whether Tribunal's decision otherwise reviewable.
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1957 (Cth), s 474 NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 followed NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 713 referred to SBAU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1076 referred to NADR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 293 referred to
WABZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
W527 of 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate