Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Andary v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1380 MIGRATION – application for order of review – where transitional (permanent) visa cancelled pursuant s 501(2) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Minister had jurisdiction to make decision – whether there existed a visa to cancel – where applicant entered Australia as infant on mothers visa – where mother left Australia and granted another entry permit on return - whether reg 4 of Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations operates retrospectively - whether father of applicant British subject – whether absorption into community provides basis for citizenship – whether decision induced or affected by actual bias – whether any evidence of absence of good faith or of Minister ignoring or intending to ignore his obligations – where Minister disclosed opinion about judges of the court in context of migration decisions – Whether decision unreasonable in legal sense PROCEDURE – whether leave to amend application to add ground ought to be granted – whether applicants argument in relation to further ground of appeal has merit
Statutes Australian Citizenship Act ss 7, 15(5), 14(9) British Nationality Act 1948 (U.K.) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 9, 5, 34, 13, 14, 4(2), 15, 198, 474 Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations Reg 4, Reg 3 Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth) s 40(5) Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) Royal Style and Titles Act 1973 (Cth)
Cases Associated Provincial Pictures Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs & Anor v Peko-Wallsend Limited & Ors (1986) 162 CLR 24 Refd to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] 205 CLR 507 Cited NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 228 Refd to Pochi v Macphee & Anor (1982) 151 CLR 101 Discussed R v Hickman& Ors ; Ex parte Fox & Anor (1945) 70 CLR 598 Cited Re Patterson Ex parte Taylor (2001) 182 ALR 657 Cited; Discussed Salemi v Mackellar [No 2] (1977) 137 CLR 396 Cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate