Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
James v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1383 MIGRATION – application to Refugee Review Tribunal for review of decision by delegate of respondent Minister refusing to grant a protection visa – where applicant failed to complete application form in full - whether application for grant of visa had been valid
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 45, 46, 47, 54, 55, 65 and 476 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.07
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v A (1999) 91 FCR 435 referred to A v Pelekanakis (1999) 91 FCR 70 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Li (2000) 103 FCR 486 referred to Yilmaz v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 100 FCR 495 referred to Nie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 347 at [13] referred to Shahabuddin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 273 at [24], [29] referred to Nader v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 101 FCR 352 at 354 referred to Myint v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 122 referred to Bal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1191 at [12], [13]-[14] referred to Bal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 189 at [35] applied IMEDLA JEYAMALAR JAMES v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS V1030 of 2001 WEINBERG J 8 NOVEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1030 OF 2001
BETWEEN: IMEDLA JEYAMALAR JAMES
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 NOVEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate