Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Givoni Pty Ltd
[2002] FCA 1406
INDUSTRIAL LAW – where employees employed pursuant to an award – where employees and employer entered into employment agreement – where employment agreement provided for conditions of employment which were lower than minimum conditions provided for by award – whether breach of award by failure to pay certain amounts for lunch breaks, sick leave and public holidays – whether parties can contract out of provisions of award – whether doctrine of estoppel relevant to operation of award – whether over‑award payments pursuant to employment agreement can be set‑off against under‑award payments in relation to leave entitlements – where over‑award payments pursuant to employment agreement not designated as payable in respect of award entitlements to leave – whether court should exercise discretion pursuant to s 178(6) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) not to order payment of leave entitlements given over‑award payments had been made. COSTS – where ordinary rule under Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) is that costs are not awarded – where costs can be awarded pursuant to s 347(1) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) if proceedings instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause – whether proceeding instituted "vexatiously" or "without reasonable cause" given that claim was initially brought pursuant to an award to which the employer was not a party. INTEREST – applicable interest rate to be awarded pursuant to s 179A(1) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) and s 51A(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether appropriate interest rate a commercial interest rate or the relevant State penalty interest rate.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth): s 178, s 179A(1), s 347(1) Clothing Trades Award 1982 Josephson v Walker (1914) 18 CLR 691, applied Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410, applied Kidd v Savage River Mines (1984) 6 FCR 398, applied Jackson v Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd (Moore J, Industrial Relations Court of Australia, 17 October 1997, unreported), applied Walsh v Commercial Travellers' Association of Victoria [1940] VLR 259, applied Beckford Nominees Pty Ltd v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1986) 73 ALR 373, applied Kanan v Australian Postal and Telecommunications Union (1992) 43 IR 257, referred to Heidt v Chrysler Australia Limited (1975) 26 FLR 257, applied Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486, referred to Thompson v Hodder (1990) 21 FCR 467, applied EMCL Pty Ltd v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (No 2) (1998) 160 ALR 382, applied Metropolitan Health Service Board v Australian Nursing Federation (2000) 99 FCR 95, applied Ray v Radano (1967) AR(NSW) 471, considered Pacific Publications Pty Ltd v Cantlon (1983) 4 IR 415, applied Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Vista Paper Products Pty Ltd (1994) 127 ALR 673, applied Public Holidays Test Case (Print L4534, 4 August 1994), referred to Poletti v Ecob (1989) 91 ALR 381, applied Lynch v Buckley Sawmills Pty Ltd (1984) 3 FCR 503, applied Logan v Otis Elevator Co Pty Ltd [1999] 94 IR 218, applied Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia v J & J Saggio Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd (1990) 34 IR 26, referred to Namol Pty Limited v AW Baulderstone Pty Limited (No 2) (1993) 47 FCR 388, referred to Nagy v Masters Dairy Ltd (1997) 150 ALR 273, referred to Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd v Armidale City Council (Burchett J, 6 March 1998, unreported), referred to Kettle Chip Company Pty Ltd v Apand Pty Ltd (No 2) (1998) 83 FCR 466, referred to McCormick v Riverwood International (Australia) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 32, referred to TEXTILE, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR UNION OF AUSTRALIA v GIVONI PTY LIMITED V 250 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 15 NOVEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate