Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McGlade v Lightfoot [2002] FCA 1457
HUMAN RIGHTS – RACIAL DISCRIMINATION – respondent made statements to journalist during an interview in a parliamentary office – statements published in newspaper article under that journalist's byline – statements republished in another newspaper attributing the source as being the first article – whether respondent made those statements "otherwise than in private" – whether the making of those statements was reasonably likely in all the circumstances to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people – whether respondent's act was done because of the race or ethnic origin of a person or people in the relevant group – onus of proof in relation to statutory exemption – whether in addition to the making of a declaration and an order for payment of costs, the Court should order (as sought by the applicant) the respondent to make a substantial donation to the Aboriginal Advancement Council.
Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), s 18B, 18C and 18D
Kowalski v Domestic Violence Crisis Service Inc (2001) 113 FCR 67 followed Feghaly v Oldfield (2000) EOC 93-090 referred to March v Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506 applied Alphacell Ltd v Woodward [1972] AC 824 referred to Hagan v Trustees of the Toowoomba Sports Ground Trust [2000] FCA 1615 applied Creek v Cairns Post Pty Ltd (2001) 112 FCR 352 applied Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080 applied Jones v Toben [2002] FCA 1150 applied Vines v Djordjevitch (1955) 91 CLR 512 followed HANNAH McGLADE v SENATOR ROSS LIGHTFOOT W568 of 2001 CARR J 26 NOVEMBER 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W568 OF 2001
BETWEEN: HANNAH McGLADE
Applicant
AND: SENATOR ROSS LIGHTFOOT
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate