Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fendi Adele SRL v Friedland [2002] FCA 1486 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – trade mark infringement – respondent offered for sale and sold goods bearing certain signs – goods offered for sale and sold were not manufactured with the authority or licence of the applicants – whether signs on goods "substantially identical" to trade marks registered by the applicants in respect of those classes of goods. TRADE PRACTICES – respondent traded under name of applicant – respondent offered for sale and sold goods bearing applicant's name and signs substantially identical to registered trade marks of applicant – whether conduct amounted to misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) – whether conduct amounted to the making of false representations in contravention of Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) – whether conduct constituted passing off – whether earlier use of name by respondent was a defence to applicant's claim of misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – whether earlier use of name by respondent gave rise to doctrines of equitable estoppel or acquiescence.
Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth): s 120(1) Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic): s 9, s 12
Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited (1963) 109 CLR 407, considered Conagra Inc v McCain Foods (1992) 33 FCR 302, applied Petersville Sleigh Ltd v Sugarman [1998] VR 426, applied Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177, applied R & C Products Pty Ltd v SC Johnson & Sons Pty Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 188, applied Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1981) 149 CLR 191, applied Erven Warnink Besloten v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731, applied Moorgate Tobacco Co Limited v Philip Morris Limited (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 41, applied B M Auto Sales Pty Ltd v Budget Rent A Car System Pty Ltd (1976) 12 ALR 363, applied Geoffrey Inc v Luik (1997) 38 IPR 555, applied FENDI ADELE SRL & ANOR v ARIEH FRIEDLAND V 835 of 2001 GOLDBERG J 29 NOVEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate