Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Purple Harmony Plates Pty Limited (No 3) [2002] FCA 1487
CONTEMPT – failure to comply with court orders – order sought requiring respondents to perform certain acts to transfer registration of domain name to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission – purpose of transfer to enable Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to post corrective advertising on website – whether transfer futile – warrant sought for committal of respondents to prison – respondent denied authority and jurisdiction of the court – whether failure to comply with orders wilful. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – jurisdiction – order sought requiring respondents to facilitate transfer of registration of domain name to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission – registrar of domain name outside jurisdiction – property the subject of the order sought outside jurisdiction – registrant of domain name within jurisdiction. Federal Court Rules: O 37 r3 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth): s 23 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Purple Harmony Plates Pty Limited [2001] FCA 1062, referred to Gunter v Hollingworth [2002] FCA 943, considered Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571, applied Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511, applied Matthews v Australian Securities & Investments Commission (2000) 97 FCR 396, applied Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Merribee Pastoral Industries Pty Ltd (1998) 84 FCR 367, applied Medibank Private Ltd v Cassidy [2002] FCAFC 290, referred to Jackson v Sterling Industries Limited (1987) 162 CLR 612, referred to Patrick Stevedores Operations (No 2) Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 153 ALR 643, referred to Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380, referred to Penn v Lord Baltimore (1750) 1 Ves Sen 444; 27 ER 1132, applied Tritech Technology Pty Ltd v Gordon (2000) 48 IPR 52, referred to National Australia Bank Ltd v Dessau [1988] VR 521, applied Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Matthews (1999) 32 ACSR 404, referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Goldstar Corporation Pty Ltd (Drummond J, 6 November 1998, unreported), referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v INFOPC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949, applied Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98, considered AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PURPLE HARMONY PLATES PTY LIMITED (No 3) V 866 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 29 NOVEMBER 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate