Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stone v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1492
INCOME TAX – applicant elite athlete received prize money, government grants, some fees for attendance at functions and sponsorship moneys or benefits – whether income in ordinary concepts – whether applicant carried on a business where also Police Officer. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 25, 26(e)
Scott v Commissioner of Taxation (1935) 3 ATD 142 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540 cited Inland Revenue Commissioner v Livingston (1927) 11 TC 538 cited Ericksen v Last (1881) 8 QB 414 cited Newton v Pyke (1908) 25 TLR 127 cited Evans v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 89 ATC 4,540 cited Hope v Bathhurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 cited Ferguson v Commissioner of Taxation (1979) 79 ATC 4,261 referred to Inglis v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 80 ATC 4,001 cited Case No. T 14, 18 TBRD 67 considered Case No. S 17 17 TBRD 89 considered First Provincial Building Society Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 56 FCR 320 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540 discussed Hayes v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 96 CLR 47 discussed Scott v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 117 CLR 514 discussed Smith v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 164 CLR 513 discussed Brown v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 49 ATR 301 cited Reuter v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 93 ATC 4,037 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Harris (1980) 30 ALR 10 discussed Parsons, Income Taxation in Australia, Law Book Co, 1985 JOANNA STONE v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V 748 of 2001 HILL J 29 NOVEMBER 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY V748 OF 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate