Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Consolidated Constructions Pty Ltd v Bellenville Pty Ltd
[2002] FCA 1513
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory orders – Mareva type – asset preservation order – respondent developer incorporated for single purpose development comprising acquisition, major refurbishment ($23 million) and sale of building – paid up capital of $2 – claim by builder for substantial damages for misleading or deceptive conduct – developer sold building before practical completion – developer intended to disburse proceeds to its two shareholders – developer had no other assets – whether necessary to prove purpose to frustrate any judgment which builder might obtain – principles applicable – discretionary considerations. Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 referred to Riley McKay Pty Ltd v McKay [1982] 1 NSWLR 264 followed National Australia Bank Ltd v Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 271 referred to Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 applied Glenwood Management Group Pty Ltd v Mayo (1991) 2 VR 49 referred to Northcorp Ltd v Allman Properties (Australia) Pty Ltd [1994] 2 Qd R 405 referred to Hayden v Teplitzky (1997) 74 FCR 7 referred to Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1992) 9 ACSR 404 referred to CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD v BELLENVILLE PTY LTD & ORS W 283 of 2002 CARR J 4 DECEMBER 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W283 OF 2002
BETWEEN: CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD
(ACN 008 699 330)
Applicant
AND: BELLENVILLE PTY LTD (ACN 089 687 114)
First Respondent
MANABROOK PTY LTD (ACN 088 231 743)
Second Respondent
MAB CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 065 207 230)
Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate