Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited v HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in liquidation) [2002] FCA 1549 Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited (ACN 061 215 601) & Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M. v HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation) (ACN 47 008 482 291), AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and New Hampshire INSURANCE Company, Heath Group Limited (formerly CE Health plc), Heath Insurance Broking Ltd formerly CE Heath (Insurance Broking) Ltd and Heath North America and Special Risks Ltd, Ice Media Limited and Premier Media Limited & J P Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly known as Chemical Securities Inc) N827 of 2002 JACOBSON J SYDNEY 21 November 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N827 OF 2002
BETWEEN: Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited ACN 061 215 601
FIRST APPLICANT
Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M.
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation) ACN 47 008 482 291
FIRST RESPONDENT
AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and New Hampshire INSURANCE Company
SECOND RESPONDENTs
Heath Group Limited (formerly CE Health plc), Heath Insurance Broking Ltd formerly CE Heath (Insurance Broking) Ltd and Heath North America and Special Risks Ltd
THIRD RESPONDENTs
Ice Media Limited and Premier Media Limited
FOURTH RESPONDENT
J P Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly known as Chemical Securities Inc)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON
DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave is granted to file in Court the affidavit of L O Kolomyjec sworn on 21 November 2002, affidavit of L M Pring and the amended notice of motion of third respondent. 1. In accordance with paragraph 1 of the notice of motion of second respondent filed on 20 November 2002, at the hearing to commence on 25 November 2002 the testimony of Leslie Mark Pring be given from London by video link (s 47A of the Federal Court Act). 1. The applicant to pay the costs of the second respondent on this notice of motion. Costs of the other respondents to be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate