Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Philmac Pty Limited v The Registrar of Trade Marks [2002] FCA 1551 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for registration of a trade mark – colour mark – capability of colour applied to the designated goods of the applicant to distinguish those goods from the goods of other persons – whether mark inherently adapted to distinguish – whether by reason of the extent of the applicant's use of the mark the mark in fact distinguished the applicant's goods. JURISDICTION – appeal from decision of Registrar of Trade Marks under s 35(b) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – nature of appeal – appeal in nature of hearing de novo. Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), ss 6, 17, 19, 27, 33(3), 35, 41, 63, 65, 120, 197. Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth), s 6 Blount v Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 83 FCR 50 – discussed Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 45 IPR 411 – referred to Jafferjee v Scarlett (1937) 57 CLR 115 – referred to Rowntree PLC v Rollbits Pty Ltd (1988) 90 FLR 398 – referred to Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (1999) 44 IPR 551; [1999] FCA 816 – referred to Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks [2000] FCA 177 – referred to Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511 – applied Kenman Kandy Australia Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2002] FCAFC 273 – discussed 'Weldmesh' Trade Mark [1966] RPC 220 – discussed Burger King Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks (1973) 128 CLR 417 – discussed FH Faulding & Co Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd (1965) 112 CLR 537 – discussed Blue Paraffin Trade Mark [1977] RPC 473 – cited Nor-Am Chem. Co. v OM Scott & Sons Co, 44 USPQ 2d (BNA) 1316 – discussed Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products (1997) 40 IPR 279 – referred to British Sugar Plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd [1996] RPC 281 – referred to TGI Fridays Australia Pty Ltd v TGI Friday's Inc (2000) 100 FCR 358 – cited Re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation 774 F 2d 1116 (1985) – considered Campbell Soup Co v Amrour & Co 138 F 2d 4 (7th Cir 1950) – discussed Genetics Institute Inc. v Kirin-Amgen Inc. (No.3) (1998) 41 IPR 325 – referred to Merck & Co. Inc. v Sankyo Co. Ltd (1992) 23 IPR 415 – referred to PHILMAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 007 873 047) v THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS S 8 of 2001 MANSFIELD J 13 DECEMBER 2002 ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate