Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patrick v Capital Finance Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1570 TRADE PRACTICES –– misleading and deceptive conduct –– representative proceedings – prospectus issued for stage production "Crazy For You" – applicant invested money in stage production – tax-driven investment scheme – loans made to investors – assignment of loans – use of investors' funds – purchase of term bonds as security – representations made in prospectus – allegation that representations as to use of investors' funds were misleading – knowledge of respondents – claim of aiding and abetting misleading conduct – whether case to answer CONTRACT –– agreements underpinning investment scheme – obligations of various respondents –– allegations of breach of contractual obligations – claim of interference with contractual relations – whether case to answer EQUITY – investment scheme – Crazy For You investors' fund – investors' representative – trustee – fiduciary duties – trust property – allegations of breach of fiduciary duties – claim of accessorial liability – Barnes v Addy claim – whether case to answer PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applicant's case closed –– no-case submission – relevant principles – causes of action related –– evidentiary hiatus – whether case to answer Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 52, 75B Union Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Puddy [1949] VLR 242 applied Prentice v Cummins (No 5) [2002] FCA 1503 referred to Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 referred to Rasomen v Shell Company of Australia Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 216 referred to Protean (Holdings) Ltd v American Home Assurance Co [1985] VR 187 referred to Residues Treatment & Trading Co Ltd v Southern Resources Ltd (1989) 52 SASR 54 referred to Preston v Dowell (1987) 45 SASR 111 referred to Trade Practices Commission v Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd (1981) 37 ALR 225 referred to James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1986) 64 ALR 347 referred to Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634 cited Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 cited Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch. App. 244 referred to Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 3 WLR 64 cited WILLIAM GEORGE DOUGHTY PATRICK (for himself and as representing the persons referred to in paragraph 1 of the Statement of Claim) v
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate