Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Essenbourne Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1577 TAXATION - tax deduction - whether entitled to claim deduction for contribution to employee incentive trust - whether payment constituted capital expenditure - whether payment referrable to income production - whether tax benefit - whether applicant engaged in scheme to avoid tax TAXATION - fringe benefits tax - whether contribution to employee incentive trust ought to have been included in calculation fringe benefits taxable amount - whether trustee of employee incentive trust an associate of employees - whether payment property or residual benefit - whether individuals ought to be identified where multiple participants in trust - whether benefit to employee in connection with employment EVIDENCE - rule in Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 - whether failure to call witness ought to give rise to drawing of adverse inferences
Statutes Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 23 Fringe Benefits Tax Act 1986 (Cth) s 5 Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth) ss 67, 66, 136 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 177F, 51, 177D, 177C, 26AAB Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZ
Cases British Insulated & Helsby Cables Ltd v Atherton (1926) AC 205 Discussed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Peabody (1994) 181 CLR 359 Cited Fletcher v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 173 CLR 1 Cited Hart v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCAFC 222 Cited J & G Knowles & Associates Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 96 FCR 402 Cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Applied Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 90 FCR 274 Cited Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 49 FLR 183 Cited Peabody v Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 40 FCR 531 Cited Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 43 FCR 223 Refd to Sun Newspapers Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1939) 61 CLR 337 Cited The State of Queensland v The Commonwealth of Australia [The First Fringe Benefits Tax Case] (1986) 162 CLR 74 Cited ESSENBOURNE PTY LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Q 170 of 2001 AND ESSENBOURNE PTY LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION V 273 of 2001 KIEFEL J 17 DECEMBER 2002 BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate