Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NACT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1619
NACT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N1107 OF 2002
EMMETT J 20 DECEMBER 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1107 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NACT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 DECEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. the application be dismissed 2. the applicant pay the respondent's costs Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1107 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NACT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE: 20 DECEMBER 2002
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 The applicant in this matter is a citizen of Algeria. He arrived in Australia on 10 June 1988. On 24 February 1992 he lodged an application for a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('the Act'). On 28 April 1993 a delegate of the respondent, the Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs ('the Minister') refused to grant the protection visa.
2 The applicant sought review of the delegate's decision. That matter came before the Refugee Review Tribunal, which, on 23 September 1999, affirmed the decision not to grant a protection visa. The applicant has been involved in other disputes with the Minister including one that led to a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal on 25 September 2002, in which that tribunal affirmed a decision that the applicant was not entitled to the grant of a Bridging Visa E Class WE.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate