Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAEX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1633
MIGRATION – removal from Australia – pending application before Court for constitutional writs in respect of decision of Migration Review Tribunal affirming decision to refuse bridging visa – urgent application for interlocutory relief restraining Minister from removing applicant pending final hearing and determination of proceeding – whether serious question to be tried as to whether applicant would obtain the constitutional writs sought – balance of convenience – construction of s 198 Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 198
NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 applied NABM of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 294 applied Huo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 383 applied WAAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 409 applied R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 cited SBBO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 963 cited Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC181 applied Kopiev v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA1831 cited Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 192 ALR 581 cited
NAEX v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL
& INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1272 OF 2002 LINDGREN J 21 DECEMBER 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1272 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NAEX
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate